<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lower Thames Crossing- Update	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ucra.co.uk/lower-thames-crossing-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ucra.co.uk/lower-thames-crossing-update/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 18:06:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: linda hawthorn		</title>
		<link>https://www.ucra.co.uk/lower-thames-crossing-update/#comment-15830</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[linda hawthorn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2017 11:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucra.co.uk/?p=4102#comment-15830</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ucra.co.uk/lower-thames-crossing-update/#comment-15815&quot;&gt;Jim&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes, I  agree Jim, but there were other routes, and they could have been done within 2-3 years.  This route will take up to 10 years to be built, and the problem is there now Linda Hawthorn]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.ucra.co.uk/lower-thames-crossing-update/#comment-15815">Jim</a>.</p>
<p>Yes, I  agree Jim, but there were other routes, and they could have been done within 2-3 years.  This route will take up to 10 years to be built, and the problem is there now Linda Hawthorn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony		</title>
		<link>https://www.ucra.co.uk/lower-thames-crossing-update/#comment-15818</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 18:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucra.co.uk/?p=4102#comment-15818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They really need to look at option A again as the consultation was flawed. Agree it should be done asap but the current northbound crossing delays is caused as the tunnels aren&#039;t tall enough so by replacing them with tunnels fit for purpose saves people&#039;s homes and the green belt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They really need to look at option A again as the consultation was flawed. Agree it should be done asap but the current northbound crossing delays is caused as the tunnels aren&#8217;t tall enough so by replacing them with tunnels fit for purpose saves people&#8217;s homes and the green belt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim		</title>
		<link>https://www.ucra.co.uk/lower-thames-crossing-update/#comment-15815</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 15:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ucra.co.uk/?p=4102#comment-15815</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry for the local residents but this scheme just has to happen.....
The tunnel/bridge are totally inadequate and another crossing just has to happen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the local residents but this scheme just has to happen&#8230;..<br />
The tunnel/bridge are totally inadequate and another crossing just has to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
